I was only reading and translating each sentence then responding in the order they were written. I can only assume it was directed towards thystonius or more likely, towards me. So I thought maybe he's right. I can contribute more and be more helpful. I'll learn to program. Afterall, I was programming q basic when I was only 6 or 7 and writing my own story games (using simple boolean formulae lol) how hard could it be? After I began, I quickly realized this wasn't some easy task and was basically a slap to my face. The message I got was if you don't like this game, script your own game because no one cares unless it's their own idea. I especially like the part about how the "community" can customize the game and balance it. I couldn't help but wonder what % of the "community" is actually capable of programming and what % of those programmers have the time to donate or desire? I'm guessing you can count this group on 1 hand. At this point it seemed more like a statement of intolerance towards suggestions that aren't aligned with his own unless he speaks for the entire developmental team in which case that is worse.nyktos wrote:i can understand someone getting upset by the way things are handled here,Xero wrote:I think the point is clear and somewhat degrading to say the least.
I'm not seeing any miscommunication. I think I get the point.
but degradation of the community is the last thing on our minds.
we are all very busy, and live in different parts of the world.
not every exchange with the public is handled properly - but we try.
some side notes...
- the coming overhaul of the combat system has the potential to change how stats work
(fine tuning "how things are now" is almost a moot practice)
- there are holes in this game, obviously - it's being built from the ground up
(there are plans for the future that already cover what's being discussed)
some thoughts on your points...
Xero wrote:1. What contributions I have made aren't considered helpful enough to receive recognition.
2. I'm not putting any effort into coding the suggestions so it's not considered for implementation.
3. My ideas aren't well articulated and I haven't considered how this may affect the game.
1. everyone on the dev team has a differing opinion on how things should be
2. everything is considered for implementation,
and others are free to take the game & add to it on their own...
like the amazing BlackBerry version - it even has *gasp* music!!!
i kinda want to hear it!
3. did someone tell you that you're not articulating your ideas & such?
or are you saying this about yourself?
[this is not a sarcastic question]
just trying to avoid confusion that text based communications can lead to.
i hope we can all keep discussing things...
i have been extremely busy - but now i hope i can spend more time here
mending?
take it easy X
/matthew
By no means am I angry, in fact I tend to display no emotions in real life, I just don't think this particular approach offers positive construction to the progress of the game. In the end, it's not my game, but I do enjoy it and it is relaxing. If this is really how people feel about my opinions I am perfectly ok with just playing it and not putting any effort into it's development.
Sincerely,
X