In order to reply to your comments, I think it would be best to divide my answers into two categories. I did not create Andor's Trail, and became an active contributor less than a year ago, so my personal opinions on ideas do not necessarily reflect the current or future position of the development team.
Answers based on my personal opinion:
- Dwarves, elves, orcs... they are very common creatures in medieval-fantasy setting, and tend to push towards a Tolkien/D&D world. We have many humanoid creatures in AT (Auleths, Zortaks...), but they are at best organized in a primitive tribe kind of way. Humans are the only full-fledged civilization, having its own internal issues (Feyguard vs Nor City). I would vote against changing that by adding parallel civilization, especially of the usual dwarf/elf/orc type.
- Calling AT a "roguelike" is definitely confusing. It fits the RPG definition best.
- I am no expert in D&D (? I suppose) world, so forgive my ignorance about the "elven flyer". However, fast transportation systems have been suggested many times before, and rejected as many times. AT creator, Oskar, explicitely rejected it (check out
this wiki page. A point-to-point teleporter (or gameplay-equivalent device) can be used in specific locations, for storyline reasons (like in BWM).
- Sure, I agree the "bad guy making the volcano erupt" is a cliché that we should avoid, but it's just what came out of my head in the 10 seconds I took to give a more fitting alternative to the "backne" (I love the word though

) thing.
Answers based on already discussed topics or Oskar's words:
- For the "dark" aspect of the world, as well as the "volcano on the back of a giant" thing, I refer you to
this wiki page, especially this line:
wiki wrote:
The world of Andor’s Trail is a rough place. Prefer blood, dirt, skulls and darkness over rainbow colored unicorns with flowers.
The world should be believable. Maps should look natural.
Maybe "dark" was not the best word to use, but "rough" is pretty much what I meant (non-native English speaker).
It's great that you feel so serious about AT, and want to offer ideas ! We really need help from this community to create more content, and you seem to have good ones. I actually think this whole thread could evolve into something usable given enough work and refinement is put into it. Read the other pages in the
developer section of the wiki to know more about our current guidelines. I sincerely hope that I have not upset you by giving a contradictory opinion, and wish to get more input from you in the future.
Lvl: 78, XP: 8622632, Gold: 271542, RoLS: 1, ElyR: -, RoL: -, ChaR: 1, GoLF: 1, ShaF: 1, SRoV: 1, VSH: 1, WMC: 1, GoW: 1
HP: 71, AC: 301%, AD: 38-47, AP: 3, ECC: 50%, CM: 3.75, BC: 101%, DR: 2