New Game+ ???

[Thystonius]

In other RPG's you can not complete all the quests / challenges / collectables without completing the game in New Game+... it isnot a must, but would add a lot of spice to the game.

[only1doug]

oddly this thread is bugged for me as it shows as unread even afdter I have repeatedly read it.

I'm hoping that posting in the thread will clear that bug. (edit: it did)


on Topic: I would support the idea of new game+ if you only keep legendary/extraordinary items, keeping quest items / quest reward skills should not be possible IMO, keeping shop purchased items is unnecessary at that point as your base stats will be sufficient to overcome most early threats.

[Meirerion]

I don't like this idea much as I'm more of a hardcore RPGer.
The aim of a RPG is to create a fake "life", a substitute for the boring one you live. In your life you have to make decisions, should I side with the bully or defend the bullied.
Once you've done this choice you can hardly change. You become the Bully or the bullied.
In those rpgs when I decide to save the queen and kill the king it is because in my subjective point of view the queen is the "good" one and the king the "bad" one. My character being a lawful neutral I have to make this choice.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alignment_ ... 6_Dragons)

I always killed Vacor because he's the "bad" one for me even if sometimes I wonder what would happen if I killed the other one.

I love this RPG because of the choices he gives you and I agree with Oskar and Tek, once you've made your choice there's no turning back.

[Pyrizzle]

[Split topic moved conversation about RPGs we play to a new thread in the Tavern]

Topic: New Game+