v0.8.13 (Troubling Times) active on Google Play

Useful links
Source code of the game - Contribution guide - ATCS Editor - Translate the game on Weblate - Example walkthrough - Andor's Trail Directory - Join the Discord
Get the game (v0.8.13) from Google, Github, F-Droid, our server, or itch.io

weapons should always have a low amount of BC

Unstructured ideas, requests and suggestions for the development of the game.
Ian
Posts: 395
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:24 am
android_version: 4.2
Location: Germany and the world of AT :D

weapons should always have a low amount of BC

Post by Ian »

I would find it more logic if weapons had at least a low BC because in a fight weapons are also used as stopping the hit of your enemy.
The BC should be different between the different types of weapons.
-short swords 7 BC
-long swords 5 BC (heavier than short sword)
-club 5 BC
-knife 1 BC
-dagger 3 BC
What are your thoughts?
Mapmaker for Andor's Trail
Lvl: 73, XP: 6655552, Gold: 327905, RoLS: -, ElyR: -, RoL: -, ChaR: 1, GoLF: 1, ShaF: 2, SRoV: 1, VSH: 1, WMC: 1, GoW: 1
HP: 58, AC: 260%, AD: 52-62, AP: 3, ECC: -, CM: -, BC: 164%, DR: 1
User avatar
Antison
Posts: 5804
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 11:33 pm
android_version: 14 - Android 14
Location: A home without a beagle is just a house

Re: weapons should always have a low amount of BC

Post by Antison »

I like your premise, but I would think that knives & daggers should not have any BC.
Last edited by Antison on Thu Jul 19, 2012 7:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"A home without a beagle is just a house"
User avatar
fiernaq
Posts: 695
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:49 pm
android_version: 2.3 - Gingerbread

Re: weapons should always have a low amount of BC

Post by fiernaq »

Why not? A common option is to use a sword for offense and carry either a shield, buckler, or dagger in the offhand. This allows you to stop a heavy weapon with your sword and either use the offhand offensively if your opponent isn't armored or to move the opponents weapon to your offhand weapon to hold it defensively so you can swing your sword at a more heavily armored opponent.
Level: 58, HP: 102, AC: 295%, AD: 46-56, AP: 2/12, BC: 35%, DR: 4
Gold: 75235 | RoLS: 0 RoL: 0 SRoV: 0 VSH: 0
Skills: IF1, Ev1, Ev2, Ev3, CE1, CS1, CS2, Re1, WA1, HH1, Cl1, HH2, DaggerPro1, LightArmorPro1, ShieldPro1, WA2, Cl2
Equipment: Enhanced Combat Helmet, Serpent's Hauberk, Marrowtaint, Quickstrike Dagger, Remgard Shield, Villain's Ring, Villain's Ring, Leather Gloves Of Attack, Enhanced Combat Boots
Last Updated: 02-Dec-2013
Treadmore
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 1:56 am
android_version: 3.1 - Honeycomb

Re: weapons should always have a low amount of BC

Post by Treadmore »

tek wrote:I like you premise, but I would think that knives & daggers should not have any BC.
The threat of attack is a great defence ;)
buddyCasino
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 4:21 pm
android_version: 2.3 - Gingerbread

Re: weapons should always have a low amount of BC

Post by buddyCasino »

Does the fencing blade have BC? I don't have an account that owns one, but I thought so. It would make sense with that weapon.
Lvl: 65, EXP: 5.130.135, 2 x ShaF, 1 x ChaR
User avatar
Antison
Posts: 5804
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 11:33 pm
android_version: 14 - Android 14
Location: A home without a beagle is just a house

Re: weapons should always have a low amount of BC

Post by Antison »

A knife or dagger requires close hand-to-hand combat, thus the nature of the beast makes it less realistic that the weapon could help with defense.
"A home without a beagle is just a house"
User avatar
nyktos
VIP
Posts: 3463
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 5:38 pm
android_version: 7.1 - Nougat
Location: Nor City, Dhayavar

Re: weapons should always have a low amount of BC

Post by nyktos »

a knife is a dagger if you are "in combat"
a knife is a tool if you aren't "in combat"

i don't see Oskar making an even smaller blade set for combat.

(just trying to give some insight here)

---{these are the three sets so far...}---

[dagger / short] sword - QSD & DotSP
[long / broad] sword - Flagstone's Pride & Fencing Blade
two handed (sword|axe|hammer) RoL & ElyR
"Embrace the Shadow"

Image

[Lv: 60] [HP: 175] [AC: 361] [AD: 25-39] [BC: 75]
[Dual Wielding Swords] [Unarmored Fighting]
User avatar
fiernaq
Posts: 695
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:49 pm
android_version: 2.3 - Gingerbread

Re: weapons should always have a low amount of BC

Post by fiernaq »

Main differences between a knife and a dagger are that a knife is small enough to be concealable but also generally doesn't have the hilt that allows for it be used defensively.

dagger
==[>>>

knife
==>>
Level: 58, HP: 102, AC: 295%, AD: 46-56, AP: 2/12, BC: 35%, DR: 4
Gold: 75235 | RoLS: 0 RoL: 0 SRoV: 0 VSH: 0
Skills: IF1, Ev1, Ev2, Ev3, CE1, CS1, CS2, Re1, WA1, HH1, Cl1, HH2, DaggerPro1, LightArmorPro1, ShieldPro1, WA2, Cl2
Equipment: Enhanced Combat Helmet, Serpent's Hauberk, Marrowtaint, Quickstrike Dagger, Remgard Shield, Villain's Ring, Villain's Ring, Leather Gloves Of Attack, Enhanced Combat Boots
Last Updated: 02-Dec-2013
Ian
Posts: 395
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:24 am
android_version: 4.2
Location: Germany and the world of AT :D

Re: weapons should always have a low amount of BC

Post by Ian »

tek wrote:I like you premise, but I would think that knives & daggers should not have any BC.
I agree with your opinion. It's really more logic.
Mapmaker for Andor's Trail
Lvl: 73, XP: 6655552, Gold: 327905, RoLS: -, ElyR: -, RoL: -, ChaR: 1, GoLF: 1, ShaF: 2, SRoV: 1, VSH: 1, WMC: 1, GoW: 1
HP: 58, AC: 260%, AD: 52-62, AP: 3, ECC: -, CM: -, BC: 164%, DR: 1
User avatar
Centurion
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2012 8:32 pm
android_version: 2.3 - Gingerbread

Re: weapons should always have a low amount of BC

Post by Centurion »

I thought that long swords BC should have more than short swords, because it is longer...for example short: +4 BC, long: +6 BC :)...I am just saying
Centurion Dias
Lvl: 30, XP: 471304, Gold: 40142, RoLS: 2, ElyR: 0, RoL: 0, ChaR: 0, GoLF:0, ShaF: 0, SRoV: 0, VSH: 0
HP: 100, AC: 200, AD: 23-34, AP: 3, ECC: 15%, CM: 2.0, BC: 44%, DR: 2
SR: 196
Post Reply